Progress in Physical Geography

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Progress in Physical Geography, Vol. 32, No. 1, 51-64 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0309133308089497

Goal functions in ecosystem and biosphere evolution

Jonathan D. Phillips

Tobacco Road Research Team, Department of Geography, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0027, USA, jdp{at}uky.edu

Although natural selection operates at the gene or individual level, a number of proposals, hypotheses and theories exist postulating the evolution of entities such as ecosystems, and indeed the entire biosphere. Further, there exist theories of evolution that are based not on the relative advantages (be they competitive or mutualistic) conferred on individuals, populations, or taxa, but on community, ecosystem, or biosphere-level goal functions, typically related to productivity criteria. A key question is why nature would seek to optimize energy flux or efficiency, biogeochemical cycling, or anything else. While development along some optimal pathway does occur, whether this is a rule, a tendency, or merely a possibility is not clear. This paper reviews theories of evolution and ecosystem development based explicitly or implicitly on goal functions. If the environment is conceptualized as a multidimensional resource space allocated among organisms, then only three assumptions are necessary for a developmental pathway toward increasing productivity: (1) higher rates of resource procurement and use are associated with ecological or selective advantages; (2) the environment is biologically saturated (or tending in that direction); and (3) the resource space is not contracting due to external abiotic forcings. This suggests that a tendency for evolution along a pathway toward maximum energy and/more matter fluxes, storages, transformations, or cycling does not require goal functions or natural selection operating at levels beyond the individual. Key research needs involve rigorous testing of these assumptions (particularly the first two), and the relative importance of, and relationships between, various notions of productivity.

Key Words: biosphere • ecosystem • evolution • Gaia theory • goal functions • resource space allocation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?