This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by de Vente, J. Articles by Verstraeten, G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The sediment delivery problem revisited

Physical and Regional Geography Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, GEO-INSTITUTE, Celestijnenlaan 200 E, 3001, Heverlee, Belgium,joris.devente{at}geo.kuleuven.be, Soil and Water Conservation Department (CSIC-CEBAS), Campus Universitario de Espinardo, PO Box 164, 30100 Murcia, Spain

Jean Poesen

Physical and Regional Geography Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, GEO-INSTITUTE, Celestijnenlaan 200 E, 3001, Heverlee, Belgium

Mahmood Arabkhedri

Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute, PO Box 13445-1136, Tehran, Iran

Gert Verstraeten

Physical and Regional Geography Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, GEO-INSTITUTE, Celestijnenlaan 200 E, 3001, Heverlee, Belgium

Understanding the sediment delivery process at the drainage basin scale remains a challenge in erosion and sedimentation research. In the absence of reliable spatially distributed process-based models for the prediction of sediment transport at the drainage basin scale, area-specific sediment yield (SSY; t km^—2 y^—1) is often assumed to decrease with increasing drainage basin area (A). As the measurement of A is relatively simple, this assumption is frequently used for prediction of SSY in ungauged basins. However, over the last two decades several studies reported a positive or non-linear relation between A and SSY. Various authors have suggested diverse explanations for these opposing trends. This paper provides an overview of the different observed trends and summarizes the explanations for each trend. Furthermore, three typical trends are identified to conceptualize the main driving forces of the relation between A and SSY. First of all, it is emphasized that erosion and sediment deposition processes are scale dependent, and going from small (<m²) to larger areas (km²) more erosion processes become active leading to a rise in SSY with increasing A. However, for larger areas (>km²) erosion rates generally decrease and deposition in sediment sinks increases due to decreasing slope gradients, and so SSY decreases with increasing A. Next, land-cover conditions and human impact determine if hillslope erosion is dominant over channel erosion or vice versa. In the first case, SSY is expected to decrease with increasing A, while in the latter case SSY will show a continuous positive relation with A. Only for very large areas (A > ~10⁴ km²) a decrease in SSY is observed when drainage density decreases or channel banks are stabilized. Finally, spatial patterns in lithology, land cover, climate or topography can cause SSY to increase or decrease at any basin area and can therefore result in non-linear relations with A. Altogether, with increasing A often first a rise and then a decrease in SSY is observed. The decrease can be absent or can be postponed within a region due to local factors of which lithology, land cover, climate and topography are the most important ones. The large regional, local and even temporal variability in the trend between A and SSY implies that prediction of SSY based on A alone is troublesome and preferably spatially distributed information on land use, climate, lithology, topography and dominant erosion processes is required.

Key Words: erosion processes • modelling • scale • Sediment Delivery Ratio • sediment transport • sediment yield.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?