Progress in Physical Geography

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gyssels, G.
Right arrow Articles by Li, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Progress in Physical Geography, Vol. 29, No. 2, 189-217 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0309133305pp443ra

Impact of plant roots on the resistance of soils to erosion by water: a review

G. Gyssels

Physical and Regional Geography Research Group, K.U. Leuven, Redingenstraat 16, 3000, Leuven, Belgium

J. Poesen

Physical and Regional Geography Research Group, K.U. Leuven, Redingenstraat 16, 3000, Leuven, Belgium

E. Bochet

Centro de Investigaciones sobre Desertificación (CSIC), Universitat València, Spain

Y. Li

Institute of Agricultural Environment and Sustainable Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China

Vegetation controls soil erosion rates significantly. The decrease of water erosion rates with increasing vegetation cover is exponential. This review reveals that the decrease in water erosion rates with increasing root mass is also exponential, according to the equation SEP e b RP where SEP is a soil erosion parameter (e.g., interrill or rill erosion rates relative to erosion rates of bare topsoils without roots), RP is a root parameter (e.g., root density or root length density) and b is a constant that indicates the effectiveness of the plant roots in reducing soil erosion rates. Whatever rooting parameter is used, for splash erosion b equals zero. For interrill erosion the average b-value is 0.1195 when root density (kg m 3) is used as root parameter, and 0.0022 when root length density (km m 3) is used. For rill erosion these average b-values are 0.5930 and 0.0460, respectively. The similarity of this equation for root effects with the equation for vegetation cover effects is striking, but it is yet impossible to determine which plant element has the highest impact in reducing soil losses, due to incomparable units. Moreover, all the studies on vegetation cover effects attribute soil loss reduction to the above-ground biomass only, whereas in reality this reduction results from the combined effects of roots and canopy cover. Based on an analysis of available data it can be concluded that for splash and interrill erosion vegetation cover is the most important vegetation parameter, whereas for rill and ephemeral gully erosion plant roots are at least as important as vegetation cover.

Key Words: erosion models • plant roots • soil erosion • vegetation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A. Stokes, A. Lucas, and L. Jouneau
Plant biomechanical strategies in response to frequent disturbance: uprooting of Phyllostachys nidularia (Poaceae) growing on landslide-prone slopes in Sichuan, China
Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2007; 94(7): 1129 - 1136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
V. Vanacker, F. von Blanckenburg, G. Govers, A. Molina, J. Poesen, J. Deckers, and P. Kubik
Restoring dense vegetation can slow mountain erosion to near natural benchmark levels
Geology, April 1, 2007; 35(4): 303 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]