Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Environmental Sciences: A Students Companion

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Progress in Physical Geography
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nightingale, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Held, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Ecosystem process models at multiple scales for mapping tropical forest productivity

J. M. Nightingale

Biophysical Remote Sensing Group, School of Geography, Planning and Architecture, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Australia and Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Accounting, s350141{at}student.uq.edu.au

S. R. Phinn

Biophysical Remote Sensing Group, School of Geography, Planning and Architecture, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Australia and Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Accounting

A. A. Held

CSIRO Land and Water, Environmental Remote Sensing Group, GPO Box 1666, Canberra ACT, 2601, Australia

Quantifying mass and energy exchanges within tropical forests is essential for understanding their role in the global carbon budget and how they will respond to perturbations in climate. This study reviews ecosystem process models designed to predict the growth and productivity of temperate and tropical forest ecosystems. Temperate forest models were included because of the minimal number of tropical forest models. The review provides a multiscale assessment enabling potential users to select a model suited to the scale and type of information they require in tropical forests. Process models are reviewed in relation to their input and output parameters, minimum spatial and temporal units of operation, maximum spatial extent and time period of application for each organization level of modelling. Organizational levels included leaf-tree, plot-stand, regional and ecosystem levels, with model complexity decreasing as the time-step and spatial extent of model operation increases. All ecosystem models are simplified versions of reality and are typically aspatial. Remotely sensed data sets and derived products may be used to initialize, drive and validate ecosystem process models. At the simplest level, remotely sensed data are used to delimit location, extent and changes over time of vegetation communities. At a more advanced level, remotely sensed data products have been used to estimate key structural and biophysical properties associated with ecosystem processes in tropical and temperate forests. Combining ecological models and image data enables the development of carbon accounting systems that will contribute to understanding greenhouse gas budgets at biome and global scales.

Key Words: carbon cycle • ecosystem process models • remote sensing • scaling carbon fluxes • tropical forests

Progress in Physical Geography, Vol. 28, No. 2, 241-281 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0309133304pp411ra


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
S. J. Dark and D. Bram
The modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP) in physical geography
Progress in Physical Geography, October 1, 2007; 31(5): 471 - 479.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
D. F. Levia Jr. and E. E. Frost
Variability of throughfall volume and solute inputs in wooded ecosystems
Progress in Physical Geography, October 1, 2006; 30(5): 605 - 632.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
P. Aplin
Remote sensing: ecology
Progress in Physical Geography, March 1, 2005; 29(1): 104 - 113.
[PDF]