This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Phillips, J. D. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Sources of nonlinearity and complexity in geomorphic systems

Tobacco Road Research Team, Department of Geography, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA

Nonlinearity is common in geomorphology, though not present or relevant in every geomorphic problem. It is often ignored, sometimes to the detriment of understanding surface processes and landforms. Nonlinearity opens up possibilities for complex behavior that are not possible in linear systems, though not all nonlinear systems are complex. Complex nonlinear dynamics have been documented in a number of geomorphic systems, thus nonlinear complexity is a characteristic of real-world landscapes, not just models. In at least some cases complex nonlinear dynamics can be directly linked to specific geomorphic processes and controls. Nonlinear complexities pose obstacles for some aspects of prediction in geomorphology, but provide opportunities and tools to enhance predictability in other respects. Methods and theories based on or grounded in complex nonlinear dynamics are useful to geomorphologists. These nonlinear frameworks can explain some phenomena not otherwise explained, provide better or more appropriate analytical tools, improve the interpretation of historical evidence and usefully inform modeling, experimental design, landscape management and environmental policy. It is also clear that no nonlinear formalism (and, as of yet, no other formalism) provides a universal meta-explanation for geomorphology. The sources of nonlinearity in geomorphic systems largely represent well-known geomorphic processes, controls and relationships that can be readily observed. A typology is presented, including thresholds, storage effects, saturation and depletion, self-reinforcing feedback, self-limiting processes, competitive feedbacks, multiple modes of adjustment, self-organization and hysteresis.

Key Words: chaos • complexity • dynamical instability • geomorphology • nonlinearity • self-organization

Progress in Physical Geography, Vol. 27, No. 1, 1-23 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/0309133303pp340ra


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Hewitt Disturbance regime landscapes: mountain drainage systems interrupted by large rockslides Progress in Physical Geography, July 1, 2006; 30(3): 365 - 393. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Hillman and G. Brierley A critical review of catchment-scale stream rehabilitation programmes Progress in Physical Geography, March 1, 2005; 29(1): 50 - 76. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. S.J. Dollar Fluvial geomorphology Progress in Physical Geography, September 1, 2004; 28(3): 405 - 450. [PDF]