Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Progress in Physical Geography
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wiggs, G. F.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Desert dune processes and dynamics

Giles F.S. Wiggs

Sheffield Centre for International Drylands Research, Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK

This article reviews the advances made and problems encountered in the measurement, modelling and understanding of desert dune dynamics and processes in the last two decades. The main findings of three methods of investigation are reviewed: field studies, wind tunnel studies and mathematical modelling. Whilst major advances in field techniques have allowed an appreciation of the aerodynamic nature of sand dunes, particular problems with field research are evident in the measurement of aeolian processes on dune surfaces. Specifically, it is shown that attempts to ascertain shear stresses on dune windward slopes in the field and relate changes in stress to sand transport rate and erosion/deposition measurements have generally failed. These difficulties have arisen because the non-log-linear nature of wind velocity profiles on dune surfaces as a result of windflow acceleration has made the calculation of surface shear stresses unviable. Significant advances have been achieved in wind tunnel modelling where high-frequency hot-wire anemometer measurements have enabled shear stress and turbulence characteristics to be determined, although problems have been encountered in choosing appropriate scaling parameters. Empirical field and wind tunnel data have allowed the calibration of mathematical models which are now at a stage where the flow field around dunes can be calculated. It is considered, however, that the emerging technique of modelling using complex systems theory may hold the key to constructing a reliable framework for future investigations. New complex systems models have emphasized the need to return to a larger-scale perspective where dunes are not considered as individual elements, but as an integral part of a dunefield where aeolian processes at the dune scale are not thought to be significant.

Key Words: aeolian processes • complex systems • hot-wire anemometer • mathematical modelling • sand dune dynamics • sand transport • shear stress • turbulence • wind tunnel modelling • wind velocity

Progress in Physical Geography, Vol. 25, No. 1, 53-79 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/030913330102500103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
K. Munyikwa
The role of dune morphogenetic history in the interpretation of linear dune luminescence chronologies: a review of linear dune dynamics
Progress in Physical Geography, September 1, 2005; 29(3): 317 - 336.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
D. J. Nash
Arid geomorphology
Progress in Physical Geography, June 1, 2003; 27(2): 284 - 303.
[PDF]


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
D. J. Nash
Arid geomorphology
Progress in Physical Geography, September 1, 2001; 25(3): 409 - 427.
[PDF]