Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Progress in Physical Geography
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kent, M.
Right arrow Articles by Armitage, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Landscape and plant community boundaries in biogeography

Martin Kent

Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK

Wendy J. Gill

Department of Geography, The University College of St Mark and St John, Derriford, Plymouth PL6 8BH, UK

Ruth E. Weaver

Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK

Richard P. Armitage

Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK

The increasing relevance and importance of the subject of landscape ecology to bio geography are introduced. Research into landscape and plant community boundaries, never theless, remains comparatively neglected. In particular, the nature of those boundaries in terms of the patterns of floristic change and related ecosystem properties constitutes a potentially signifi cant new area of research for biogeographers. The term 'ecotone' has traditionally been used to describe boundaries between plant communities and ecosystems at a range of scales. Various definitions are presented and the often confusing terminology surrounding the word 'ecotone' is reviewed. Boundary types range from sharp, clearly defined boundaries (ecotones) between more highly modified plant communities and anthropogenically created land-use types at one extreme, to more gradual and diffuse boundaries (ecoclines) between natural and semi-natural plant communities at the other. It is proposed that the term 'transitional area' is used to describe all types of vegetation boundary when working at the local/community scale.

There is little literature of direct significance to the subject of transitional areas. The concept can only be meaningfully discussed in the context of recent developments in the conceptualization of the plant community and these are summarized. The importance of mosaics within plant communities is described and the need to understand and recognize mosaics when studying transitional areas between plant communities is emphasized.

The range of research methods available to describe and analyse variations in patterns of floristics and associated environmental variables across transitional areas is then critically reviewed. The potential relevance of remote sensing and geographical information systems, net work analysis and fractals is demonstrated. Ideas on possible adaptations of sampling strategies for the description of floristics and environmental/biotic factors to cater for boundary/transitional area situations are presented and the concept of a rectangular sampling area as an alternative to the more normal linear transect is introduced. The traditional approach to the description of vegetation change across boundaries using transects and similarity coefficients has now been superseded by new developments, notably moving-window analysis, the Mantel test, pattern analysis, semi-variograms, spectral analysis and analysis for spatial autocorrelation, and the scope of these methods is summarized.

Finally, the dynamics of plant communities and their boundaries are considered and the implications of research into transitional areas for vegetation management and biological conserv ation are assessed. The importance of this whole subject as a possible new focus for biogeography and spatial ecology is then reiterated.

Key Words: ecotone • ecocline • transitional areas • phytosociology • vegetation science • fractals • remote sensing • network analysis • multivariate analysis • vegetation management.

Progress in Physical Geography, Vol. 21, No. 3, 315-353 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/030913339702100301


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
M. Kent
Biogeography and landscape ecology
Progress in Physical Geography, June 1, 2007; 31(3): 345 - 355.
[PDF]