Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Environmental Sciences: A Students Companion

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Progress in Physical Geography
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Drainage rearrangement by river capture, beheading and diversion

Paul Bishop

Victorian Institute of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Department of Geography and Environmental Science, Monash University, Clayton VIC 3168, Australia

Drainage rearrangement, involving stream piracy (capture), drainage diversion and/or beheading, may be significant for sediment budgets (including sediment provenance) and biotic distributions, as well as for its more usually considered role in landscape evolution. The processes involved in drainage rearrangement are not as self-evident as its abundant literature indicates. This is especially the case with the commonly invoked stream capture. The key process in stream capture, namely, drainage head retreat, is difficult to envisage as a normal part of drainage net evolution, especially in the light of recent findings on drainage hollow evolution. Stream capture may therefore be a relatively rare event in drainage net evolution. This, and uncertainties with interpretations of supposed elbows of capture, mean that stream capture should not be routinely invoked in interpretations of long-term drainage evolution. Further uncertainties associated with the maintenance of drainage lines during the erosion of significant crustal sections, especially in faulted and folded terrains, diminish the likelihood of many supposed examples of stream capture. It is more likely that examples of drainage rearrangement attributed to stream capture were generated by drainage diversion, but even this may involve special conditions.

Key Words: river capture • river beheading • river diversion • piracy • fluvial geomorphology • basin- hinterland relationships • tectonics.

Progress in Physical Geography, Vol. 19, No. 4, 449-473 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/030913339501900402


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The HoloceneHome page
R. Linkeviciene
Impact of river capture on hydrography and water resources: case study of Ula and Katra catchments, south Lithuania
The Holocene, December 1, 2009; 19(8): 1233 - 1240.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
J. Douglass, N. Meek, R. I. Dorn, and M. W. Schmeeckle
A criteria-based methodology for determining the mechanism of transverse drainage development, with application to the southwestern United States
Geological Society of America Bulletin, March 1, 2009; 121(3-4): 586 - 598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
D. Craw, C. Burridge, R. Norris, and J. Waters
Genetic ages for Quaternary topographic evolution: A new dating tool
Geology, January 1, 2008; 36(1): 19 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
D. CRAW and J. WATERS
Geological and biological evidence for regional drainage reversal during lateral tectonic transport, Marlborough, New Zealand
Journal of the Geological Society, July 1, 2007; 164(4): 785 - 793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
S. R. Miller and R. L. Slingerland
Topographic advection on fault-bend folds: Inheritance of valley positions and the formation of wind gaps
Geology, September 1, 2006; 34(9): 769 - 772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
G.Y. Brocard and P.A. van der Beek
Influence of incision rate, rock strength, and bedload supply on bedrock river gradients and valley-flat widths: Field-based evidence and calibrations from western Alpine rivers (southeast France)
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2006; 398(0): 101 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
C.R. Twidale
"Canons" revisited and reviewed: Lester King's views of landscape evolution considered 50 years later
Geological Society of America Bulletin, October 1, 2003; 115(10): 1155 - 1172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
M. Stokes, A. E. Mather, and A. M. Harvey
Quantification of river-capture-induced base-level changes and landscape development, Sorbas Basin, SE Spain
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2002; 191(1): 23 - 35.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
A. E. Mather and A. E. MATHER
Impact of headwater river capture on alluvial system development: an example from the Plio-Pleistocene of the Sorbas Basin, SE Spain
Journal of the Geological Society, January 1, 2000; 157(5): 957 - 966.
[Abstract] [Full Text]