This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mannion, A.M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Biotechnology and environmental quality

Department of Geography, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 227, Reading, RG6 2AB, UK

Many factors influence environmental quality and contribute to environmental change, not least of which are science and technology. Biotechnology, involving the harnessing of living organisms or components of organisms, is a case in point. Although it has been in use for many thousands of years in a limited context, e.g., fermenting and brewing, the developments in biotechnology which have occurred in the last 20 years are beginning to have a substantial impact on the environment. At present this impact concerns the manipulation of nontransgenic organisms but in the near future it will increasingly be related to the impact of transgenic organisms produced via genetic engineering. This article examines these impacts, both real and potential, which are emanating from such diverse activities as agriculture, resource recovery, pollution abatement and the production of renewable energy resources. The environmental impact of nearly all these applications involves their influences on the fundamental processes of energy flows and bio- geochemical cycles. In principle, the applications of biotechnology appear to present ways of improving environmental quality (Mannion, 1993a). Many of the applications in agriculture, for example, should lead to a reduction in fossil-fuel inputs with consequent benefits for the global environment. However, there are justifiable concerns about the release of transgenic organisms and their potential to interbreed with wild relatives. The outcome could give rise to ecological disasters, as so many introductions of species into nonindigenous environments have caused in the past. Alternatively, such organisms may produce compounds that are toxic to plants, animals and humans. Regulations, including internationally recognized standards, are thus required to monitor the use of transgenic organisms. There are also, potentially, many cultural disadvantages of biotechnology as transnational companies in the developed world monopolize seed businesses and control patents. This reflects the power relations of biotechnology. It also reflects the fact that the basic science may not itself be inherently disadvantageous environmentally but that the threat lies in the way it is organized and implemented.

Key Words: biotechnology • environmental quality • agriculture • resource recovery • recycling • pollution abatement • renewable energy.

Progress in Physical Geography, Vol. 19, No. 2, 192-215 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/030913339501900203


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?